We're not exactly bang up to date here, but as this is apropos to the pictures below, I thought I better mention my Dwarfs getting thrashed by a Czech High Elf army a couple of Sundays ago. The broad nature of it was that he, knowing I had a Dwarf army that could neutralise his magic, brought no spell casting at all, but instead used lots of small units of super fast, super hard infantry. It was a very one sided game - in which my Miners wisely never appeared on table. The defeat was comprehensive.
It was a useful learning experience, but not the most fun game I've ever played. As armies go it seemed to smell a bit of Cheese, if you know what I mean.
That over with I trawled round the rest of the club for something worth a few snaps, and found a chaps' extensive collection of 15mm WW2 Germans (for Flames of War, the only historical game most fantasy gamers seem to have heard of) that pleased the eye.





Lastly, a bit of potatoshop action to give that pseudo-authentic look.

What's cheesy about it?
ReplyDeleteYou got beat by someone who out thought your list. The question is can think of a way in which you army could have dealt with his.
Personally it was a list that smacked of abusing the 'powerplaying' aspects of the given army; I'm not saying the guy didn't play fairly, but the tactical aspect of the force was mainly in the list, and how it combo'd killer items in small units. I'm a big fan of the 'spirit of the game' and now fan of tournament style play - which reduces the game to a sporting exercise of winning as the sole point of involvement. A one sided game is fun only for one side, and I'd always rather field and fight in a style that is both appropriate to the army I'm using aswell as giving both players a chance. A personal handicap, yes, but it also makes wins fell merited, rather than earn't solely because you spent hours on the net sourcing the most effective points spend for a one-dimensional uber army!
ReplyDelete